Radiography Tech Salary

Kennewick vs Kirkland: Radiologic Technologist and Technician Salary (2026)

Compare radiologic technologist and technician salaries between Kennewick, WA and Kirkland, WA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Kennewick, WA
$101,952
$49.02/hr
Kirkland, WA
$99,991
$48.08/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricKennewick, WAKirkland, WA
Median Salary$101,952$99,991
Hourly Rate$49.02$48.08
Entry Level (P10)$65,396$67,203
25th Percentile$82,516$78,220
75th Percentile$114,219$122,330
Top Earner (P90)$129,107$145,443
Total Employed15013
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Kennewick ($101,952) and Kirkland ($99,991) radiologic technologist and technician salaries.KennewickKirklandMedian Salary$101,952$99,991Entry Level (P10)$65,396$67,203Top Earner (P90)$129,107$145,443US Median $84,348

Verdict

Kennewick, WA offers better overall compensation for radiologic technologists and technicians, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Kirkland.

The salary gap between Kennewick and Kirkland is $1,961 (1.96%). Kennewick's median is +20.87% compared to the US national median of $84,348.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Kennewick spans $63,711,Kirkland spans $78,240. Kirkland has a wider pay range, suggesting more variation in pay between entry-level and experienced radiologic technologist and technicians.

Kennewick
P10 (Entry)$65,396
P25$82,516
Median$101,952
P75$114,219
P90 (Top)$129,107
Kirkland
P10 (Entry)$67,203
P25$78,220
Median$99,991
P75$122,330
P90 (Top)$145,443

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, Kennewick ($101,872 effective) pays 9.42% more than Kirkland ($93,101 effective).

Kennewick
Nominal: $101,952
CoL Index: 100.079
Adjusted: $101,872
Kirkland
Nominal: $99,991
CoL Index: 107.4
Adjusted: $93,101

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Kennewick if…

  • Higher median salary ($101,952/year)
  • Larger job market (150 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $101,872)
  • You prefer the Washington area and lifestyle

Choose Kirkland if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($145,443)
  • You prefer the Washington area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, radiologic technologist and technician salaries in Kennewick grew 40.0% from 2019 to 2025, compared to -3.6% growth in Kirkland over the same period.

Kennewick, WA

+40.0%

$69,160 (2019) → $96,830 (2025)

Kirkland, WA

+-3.6%

$98,473 (2024) → $94,967 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays radiologic technologist and technicians more: Kennewick or Kirkland?

Kennewick has a higher median radiologic technologist and technician salary at $101,952/year, compared to Kirkland at $99,991/year — a difference of $1,961 (1.96%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Kennewick and Kirkland?

Kennewick radiologic technologist and technicians earn $49.02/hr while Kirkland hygienists earn $48.08/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Kennewick to Kirkland as a radiologic technologist and technician?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Kennewick and Kirkland. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Kennewick = $101,872, Kirkland = $93,101), job availability (150 vs 13 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level radiologic technologist and technicians earn in Kennewick vs Kirkland?

Entry-level (10th percentile) radiologic technologist and technicians earn $65,396 in Kennewick and $67,203 in Kirkland. The Kirkland area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

JL

Written by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM)

Career Analyst

Jordan Lee has over 10 years of experience in radiologic technology. They specialize in mammography and work in an outpatient imaging center.

Clinically reviewed by Marisol Patel, RT(R), BSData verified by Samuel Kim, RT(R)(CT), MHA

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.29% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Jordan Lee, RT(R), RT(TM), a licensed radiologic technologist and technician with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov